Great Writer’s Editor

Just a quick note. I wanted to find a simple, lightweight text editor to compose posts with, one that had a running word count (for school assingments), and a spell check – and not much else.

I found this one, Q10. It is an editor designed for one thing – banging out text. It has no fonts, none of that fancy bullet link format paragraph double spacing stuff. No scrollbars. No hover help.

Just a big black screen – no distractions – and when you type, text appears.

You can save it to a file. Cut and paste. Spell check. Best of all, down the bottom, on the status bar, there is the word count. So, for example, I can tell you that I am on paragraph 3, line 12 (lines of text, not lines on the screen), word 133.

And, it has a timer, so you can set a time goal, keep you from getting lost in those thoughts, or drifting around moodle. (or, for those of you interested, it is a perfect setup to run drills for NaNoWriMo in November – if you don’t know what that is, just ask …)

Now, for those assignment word limits – 500 words, 250 words … who cares? I can just bang out text on this baby till, well, till I’ve said my piece, or … that little word counter down in the corner ticks over.

Nice light executable, so it fits on your flash drive, you will always have your “pen” with you.

Closest thing I’ve found to a typewriter. A writer’s editor. Perfect.

Go to http://www.baara.com/q10/. Download it. Start typing (alt-tab to get to your other windows apps, F1 to get the help card) Oh My God, only twenty five more words till I hit the two hundred and fifty word goal for this piece. Oh, yea, you can download a sound file so that this baby even sounds like the typewrite you used to play with in your father’s study when you were a kid.

Yes, We Can! – from a back of the envelope calculation type perspective …

[Originally posted on Vermonters For Obama]

It was great to see everyone at the Sheraton last night, and great to watch the delegates roll in on the big screen.

It was even better to get up at 6:00 to a blanket of new snow, nervously peek at politico.com while the coffee was brewing, and see the percentages in California up from the 32% I went to bed with …

I just loved the line “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for”.

And it got me thinking … Vermont is a small state … and we are a pretty lively group … what if we wanted to knock on every door in Vermont?

According to the most recent projections from the US Census, there are 309,557 dwelling units in Vermont. Run that through the 82% occupancy rate from the ‘00 census and you get roughly 253,800 doors to try.

Now, all you GOTV vets know that we target Dems and Independents. But here in Vermont we have the TVI – the True Vermont Independent – who will put a Republican governor in office, but send a Socialist to the US Senate. Go figure. But this means you never know which door a vote might be hiding behind, so we’ll skip the targeting.

Besides, we don’t want anyone to feel left out. Bad for business if word gets around we skipping some folks.

Now our volunteer list here has about 128 people on it. A quick survey of the other VT lists shows that they are smaller, around 50 – 30 folks each. Add ‘em all in, adjust for overlap, and we get, say 175 people. If everyone brings a friend, that goes to 350, maybe pick up some strays and call it 400.

Now, for the big calculation. 253,800 door by 400 people gives us each 634 doors. 634 chances to figure out how to get that get that piece of campaign lit to sick in the screen door with the dog barking, have a great conversation with a new voter, hear stories of elections past, share thoughts & concerns, argue, be told “get out of my dooryard” …

634 doors. That is a lot. But not impossible, in the next four weeks, if we gather some help.

What do think? Willing to give it a go? Imagine all 30 VT delegates for Obama … It could tip the balance. It could send a powerful message: We are the one we are waiting for.

OK, who’s got those voter lists?

Natural Capitalism

[origionally posted as class assignment]
Response to “A Roadmap to Natural Capitalism”; What are natural capital and eco-system services, and why are they important for both business and the planet?

Natural capital is a way to express the productive value of ecosystem services, much like financial capital expresses the productive value of monetary assets. Ecosystem services are the basic biological functions that supply resources in the form of materials and energy, and provide a sink for wastes of various kinds.

Like financial capital, natural capital can be spent, conserved, or accumulated. Consider a five acre farm field, growing vegetables. We can view the ability of the land to support the crops as the natural capital inherent in the land, much as we view the ability of a tractor to support the farming operations as a form of fiscal capital. The productive ability of the field depends on both inputs.

Now, when we eat a carrot, are we extracting capital? Perhaps. We can farm in such a way that next year the field will not produce as many carrots. If we don’t replenish the soil with organic material, it will be a tad bit more tired. If we don’t rotate crops, the pests, accustomed to the same crops in the same places, will be a bit more bothersome. In this case, yes, that carrot represents a bit of spent natural capital.

On the other hand, we can farm in such a way as to leave the soil as productive next year as it was this year. We apply compost, we treat the soil with care as we plant and plow. Crops are rotated, and some land is always under cover. In this case, the carrot does not represent capital expenditures. It represents the use of the productive power of the natural capital.

How does the concept of ecosystem services tie in? Think of it this way. The land, the soil is not a thing – not simply a pile of dirt, or a place to walk – but a system. The soil is a complex system that cycles nutrients, manages moisture and water flow, builds up and builds up and breaks down stocks of organic and inorganic materials, and hosts whole communities of living organisms that both use and facilitate these processes. Any combination of these processes can be tapped into to do something useful for us.

We generally aren’t too specific or clear in our thinking about these services. We say we use the soil to “grow things”, and, unless we are a farmer, don’t think of which of the suite of the services provided by the soil-as-system we are making use of.
Natural capital then, is the productive capacity of ecosystem services. This is essential – capital is not inherent in the thing, but in the usable excess productive capacity generated by the system. This is perhaps counterintuitive, but, it is true of financial capital as well. The capital value of dollars in the bank is nil. The value of these dollars is in their power to increase productive capacity through the purchase of equipment that increases production efficiency.

The notion of natural capital is essential to a sustainable business model as the concept of natural capital changes the costs associated with natural resource use from production costs to capital costs.

Any business is loath to spend capital – it is suicide. This is especially clear when we view capital not as a thing, but as productive capacity. Give away enough productive capacity and you are done. So, a tight lid is kept on capital expenditures, and capital is always expended with an eye towards increasing productivity enough to recoup the capital, with some extra in the form of profit.

So, by putting casting resource costs as capital costs, the idea of natural capital brings the power of business to bear on the issues involved in preserving ecosystem services. This is essential to business, in that it prevents them from consuming their resource base. It is essential to the planet for the very same reasons.

Despite Public Service Board Approval, Sheffield Wind Confilct Not Over

Ridge Protectors, a citizens group opposed to a wind farm to be sited in Vermont’s North East Kingdom have filed an appeal to the Vermont Supreme Court to have the certificate of public good for the project invalidated.

The appeal contends that, among other things, the Public Service board found that UPC, the company developing the project, had failed to negotiate stably priced power contracts with Vermont utilities, and that, in the absence of these contracts, the project would not “provide and economic benefit to Vermonters sufficient to offset the project’s significant environmental impacts”.

The economic issue is one that is at the heart of the matter. One of the big selling points for the project, on the Massachusetts based UPC Wind’s Web site for the project is cheap local power. From the “power” tab, we are given a list of towns near Sheffield that “have shown strong interest in purchasing energy generated at the Sheffield project”. Another tab, under economic benefits states “Energy for Vermont utilities at competitive market rates”.

This is a bit disengenuous. As noted in the testimony before the public service board, and echoed in the final order itself:

“Unfortunately, the pricing terms of the Vermont Utilities power purchases do not capture one of the major economic advantages of renewable energy: the free, and thus stable, cost of the fuel. Instead the power contracts between UPC and Vermont utilities are largely indexed to regional power market prices, which are both highly volitile and expected to increase over time”.

Score a point for Ridge Protectors.

The Public Service Board does go on to address this in condition number three of the certificate of public good, which states that UPC shall “make all reasonable efforts to enter into diverse, long term, stably priced power contracts with Vermont Utilities”.

The ball bounces back across the court.

These contracts are to be produced prior to the commencement of construction. Has construction started without these contracts in place? If so, the Ridge Protectors appeal would seem like a sure win.

In either case, it seems that not only does the generation technology need to be developed to take advantage of clean power sources, the contracting and pricing mechanisms need development as well.